This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I’m co-facilitating a session on Nonprofit Training Design and Delivery with colleagues John Kenyon, Andrea Berry, and Cindy Leonard at the NTEN Nonprofit Technology Conference on Friday March 14th at 10:30 am! There are two different methods to evaluate your training. Use LearningTheory.
As a trainer and facilitator who works with nonprofit organizations and staffers, you have to be obsessed with learningtheory to design and deliver effective instruction, have productive meetings, or embark on your own self-directed learning path. Here’s some examples.
Join me for a FREE Webinar: Training Tips that Work for Nonprofits on Jan.29th I’ll be sharing my best tips and secrets for designing and delivering training for nonprofit professionals that get results. 29th at 1:00 PM EST/10:00 AM PST. I use a simple structure to design: before, during, and after.
I’ve been curating resources on training techniques and capacity building over at scoop.it A lot of work I do around social media is training — good training requires good design – not just content. The model balances content, learning design, and participants. This book will help.
If you’re registered for ICLR 2023, we hope you’ll visit the Google booth to learn more about the exciting work we’re doing across topics spanning representation and reinforcement learning, theory and optimization, social impact, safety and privacy, and applications from generative AI to speech and robotics.
Published on February 20, 2025 11:54 PM GMT TLDR: We made substantial progress in 2024: We published a series of papers that verify key predictions of Singular LearningTheory (SLT) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. We scaled key SLT-derived techniques to models with billions of parameters, eliminating our main concerns around tractability.
For example, suppose we have a metric d over the space of all reward functions, and that we have reason to believe that a given reward function R 2 is within a distance of to the ideal reward function R 1 (based on our learning algorithm and amount of training data, etc). If not, what errors and failure modes should we expect to see?
This guide provides an opinionated overview of recent work and open problems across areas like adversarial testing, model transparency, and theoretical approaches to AI alignment. Were interested in techniques like latent adversarial training and circuit breaking that might succeed where standard adversarial training falters.
Smith, Scott W. Linderman, David Sussillo Contact : jsmith14@stanford.edu Links: Paper | Website Keywords : recurrent neural networks, switching linear dynamical systems, interpretability, fixed points Compositional Transformers for Scene Generation Authors : Drew A.
Manning, Jure Leskovec Contact : xikunz2@cs.stanford.edu Award nominations: Spotlight Links: Paper | Website Keywords : knowledge graph, question answering, language model, commonsense reasoning, graph neural networks, biomedical qa Fast Model Editing at Scale Authors : Eric Mitchell, Charles Lin, Antoine Bosselut, Chelsea Finn, Christopher D.
The Perils of Optimizing Learned Reward Functions: Low Training Error Does Not Guarantee Low Regret In this paper , we look at what happens when a learnt reward function is optimised. However, does this guarantee that we get a low regret relative to the underlying true reward function when that reward model is optimised?
Note from Beth: At this year’s Nonprofit Technology Conference, I was lucky to co-design and facilitate a session on technology training with colleagues John Kenyon, Cindy Leonard and Jeanne Allen. Cindy and Jeanne wrote this great reflection of what we learned and how we facilitated this very interactive session.
This increase in accuracy is important to make AI applications good enough for production , but there has been an explosion in the size of these models. It is safe to say that the accuracy hasn’t been linearly increasing with the size of the model. They define it as “buying” stronger results by just throwing more compute at the model.
Platt , Fernando Pereira , Dale Schuurmans Keynote Speakers The Data-Centric Era: How ML is Becoming an Experimental Science Isabelle Guyon The Forward-Forward Algorithm for Training Deep Neural Networks Geoffrey Hinton Outstanding Paper Award Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding Chitwan Saharia , William Chan (..)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content