This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Kochenderfer Contact : philhc@stanford.edu Links: Paper Keywords : deep learning or neural networks, sparsity and feature selection, variational inference, (application) natural language and text processing Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Loss Authors : Jeff Z.
The first of these is the preference structures given by multi-objective RL, where the agent is given multiple reward functions R 1 , R 2 , R 3 , , and has to find a policy that achieves a good trade-off of those rewards according to some specified criterion. This paper is discussed in more detail in this post.
Were interested in funding research that leverages knowledge about the structure of a models activation space to efficiently estimate the probability of some particular rare output, even when that probability is too small to estimate by random sampling. Wen et al. , See this section for more details. See this section for more details.
A Workshop for Algorithmic Efficiency in Practical Neural Network Training Workshop Organizers include: Zachary Nado , George Dahl , Naman Agarwal , Aakanksha Chowdhery Invited Speakers include: Aakanksha Chowdhery , Priya Goyal Human in the Loop Learning (HiLL) Workshop Organizers include: Fisher Yu, Vittorio Ferrari Invited Speakers include: Dorsa (..)
And the way you said it just then, it sounded more like the first one: heres a new nice metric of how good your mechanistic explanation is. 00:26:47): And so what this gives us is an interaction metric where we can measure how bad this hypothesis is. Theres a little bit of structure but not very much.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content