This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Finally, in the last post, I will also provide some resources for anyone who wants to contribute to this (or similar) research, in the form of both open problems and some thoughts on how these problems could be approached. We should only trust a reward learning method that is at least reasonably robust to such errors.
To me, the main takeaway from this paper is that we should be careful with the assumption that the basic RL setting really captures everything that we intuitively consider to be part of the problem domain of sequential decision-making. This paper is discussed in more detail in this post. Alternatively, see the main paper.
This guide provides an opinionated overview of recent work and open problems across areas like adversarial testing, model transparency, and theoretical approaches to AI alignment. Motivation: Two lines of recent work have looked for undesirable behaviors in LLMs, approaching the problem from two different angles: Andriushchenko et al.
They are used for different applications, but nonetheless they suggest that the development in infrastructure (access to GPUs and TPUs for computing) and the development in deep learningtheory has led to very large models. For us, we believe in using efficiency metrics in machine learning software.
A Workshop for Algorithmic Efficiency in Practical Neural Network Training Workshop Organizers include: Zachary Nado , George Dahl , Naman Agarwal , Aakanksha Chowdhery Invited Speakers include: Aakanksha Chowdhery , Priya Goyal Human in the Loop Learning (HiLL) Workshop Organizers include: Fisher Yu, Vittorio Ferrari Invited Speakers include: Dorsa (..)
And the way you said it just then, it sounded more like the first one: heres a new nice metric of how good your mechanistic explanation is. You could imagine saying, Oh, we figured out that the difficulties in finding It was still kind of hard and our lives would be easier if we solved sub-problems, X, Y and Z.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content