This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Some relevant criteria for evaluating a specification language include: How expressive is the language? What is the right way to quantify the differences and similarities between different goal specifications in a given specification language? Are there things it cannot express? How intuitive is it for humans to work with?
Kochenderfer Contact : philhc@stanford.edu Links: Paper Keywords : deep learning or neural networks, sparsity and feature selection, variational inference, (application) natural language and text processing Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Loss Authors : Jeff Z.
Goodhart's Law in Reinforcement Learning As you probably know, "Goodhart's Law" is an informal principle which says that "if a proxy is used as a target, it will cease to be a good proxy". This paper is also discussed in this post (Paper 4). For details, see the full paper. This paper is discussed in more detail in this post.
In either of these settings, theres a chance that the LLMs will write messages that encode meaning beyond the natural language definitions of the words used. Externalizing reasoning: It could be safer to have much smaller language models which put more reasoning into natural language. and Mathew et al. Roger and Greenblatt ).
They are used for different applications, but nonetheless they suggest that the development in infrastructure (access to GPUs and TPUs for computing) and the development in deep learningtheory has led to very large models. For us, we believe in using efficiency metrics in machine learning software.
Platt , Fernando Pereira , Dale Schuurmans Keynote Speakers The Data-Centric Era: How ML is Becoming an Experimental Science Isabelle Guyon The Forward-Forward Algorithm for Training Deep Neural Networks Geoffrey Hinton Outstanding Paper Award Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding Chitwan Saharia , William Chan (..)
And the way you said it just then, it sounded more like the first one: heres a new nice metric of how good your mechanistic explanation is. 00:26:47): And so what this gives us is an interaction metric where we can measure how bad this hypothesis is. But I dont know, it feels kind of surprising for that to be the explanation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content