This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As a nonprofit, the government says you are special. . In fact, because you are a nonprofit you have to adhere to a separate set of rules and lawsgoverning fundraising, operations and finances. Recently, I attended a seminar put on by students involved with the Entrepreneurship Clinic from the local law college.
New Jersey’s Daniel’s Law, which penalizes the dissemination of names and residential addresses of judicial, law enforcement, child protection investigators and other covered individuals, is having a significant damping effect on marketing efforts – including nonprofit solicitations – aimed at Garden State residents.
Forest Service, already struggling with understaffing, fired about 3,400 workers last month roughly 10% of its workforceamid the Trump administrations efforts to shrink the federal government. A federal judge last week ordered the government to cancel its directive to lay off employees at six agencies. Even though U.S.
Let’s conclude what turned out to be Free Speech Week on The Interface with a look at a case involving the co-chairman of Facebook’s new Oversight Board, a Zoom recording of his law school class, and the N-word. Here’s Nick Anderson in the Washington Post : Stanford University law professor Michael W. Governing. ?
The Trump administration on Wednesday announced it will reconsider the reach of the nations bedrock clean water law and likely further limit the wetlands it covers , building on a Supreme Court decision two years ago that removed federal protections for significant areas. In the 2023 Supreme Court case Sackett v.
In many areas, the government earns money through oil, gas, timber and mining leases. The avenue for many of these changes is rooted in one century-old law. Advocacy groups sued the government over Trumps authority to shrink Bears Ears National Monument, but their cases were put on hold after Biden expanded the monument again.
I do not think this even comes close to passing the test for legality, said Andres Restrepo, a senior attorney in the Sierra Clubs Environmental Law Program, of the April 9 executive order, Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy. This is really just not how our laws work. It makes no sense.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content