This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Let's begin with big picture question that Gavin raised: What purpose do folksonomies serve? Gavin's post does a great job explaining the definitions and the advantages of a taxonomy over a folksonomy. socialnetwork and community sites. He observes that folksonomies are in the early stages of development.
folksonomies??? -- it's a play on the word ???taxonomies.??? Folksonomies reveal how the public is making sense of things, not just how expert cataloguers think we ought to be thinking. More broadly, some worry that folksonomies can be a type of ???tyranny Those patterns are called ???folksonomies??? taxonomies.???
The idea of "social search" -- how do we layer our socialnetwork on top of a search. Particularly if there is some momentum around using the NptechTag "folksonomy" to develop a more formal taxonomy. Is that a formalized taxonomy or not?
Donations were followed by an additional prompt to share on socialnetworks to encourage others to participate through donations. Social Bookmarking and Tagging - Listening. What Value Do Folksonomies Bring To The Online Museum Collection? 40 Hashtags for Social Good. The campaign. You're It!
Many useful observations and questions raised about how to analyze the tagging data we've collected and how to move from a folksonomy to a taxonomy. " Jayne Cravens from Coyote Communications offers advice and commentary for nonprofit organizations about online socialnetworking. " Web 2.0,
SocialNetworks: Facebook, Myspace, and many more. Described the difference between taxonomy and folksonomy. Conversation is very important and the nature of Web 2.0. Niche content. Blogs are connected - we're talking about a blogosphere. A rating of 100 or more is considered good in Romania. Personality is important.
Start working the socialnetwork sites. Start thinking about tagging and folksonomies. You don’t have to be a curator or a marketing person to be involved in your museum’s blog or socialnetwork. Do you want to offer audio or video programming to an international audience for free? Pod or Vodcast. Keep statistics.
Tagging " Beneath the Metadata: Some Philosophical Problems with Folksonomy " has been making the rounds on various nonprofit technology lists, particularly in the library and museum communities. SocialNetworking Random Thoughts on Life and Works has a post called " How Connected Are You?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content