This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This book is filled with great tips on designing engaging learning experiences that help your participants connect, inspire, and engage. The model balances content, learning design, and participants. The ideas, tips, and tricks are grounded in adult learningtheory, but the book is very practical.
Some relevant criteria for evaluating a specification language include: How expressive is the language? Similarly, a complete answer to (3) would be a (pseudo)metric d on the space of all reward functions which quantifies their similarity. We should only trust a reward learning method that is at least reasonably robust to such errors.
Kochenderfer Contact : philhc@stanford.edu Links: Paper Keywords : deep learning or neural networks, sparsity and feature selection, variational inference, (application) natural language and text processing Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Loss Authors : Jeff Z.
We think this adversarial style of evaluation and iteration is necessary to ensure an AI system has a low probability of catastrophic failure. Wed like to support more such evaluations, especially on scalable oversight protocols like AI debate. and Which rules are LLM agents happy to break, and which are they more committed to? .
We also managed to leverage these results to produce a new method for conservative optimisation, that tells you how much (and in what way) you can optimise a proxy reward, based on the quality of that proxy (as measured by a STARC metric ), in order to be guaranteed that the true reward doesnt decrease (and thereby prevent the Goodhart drop).
Derrick Xin , Behrooz Ghorbani , Ankush Garg , Orhan Firat , Justin Gilmer Associating Objects and Their Effects in Video Through Coordination Games Erika Lu , Forrester Cole , Weidi Xie, Tali Dekel , William Freeman , Andrew Zisserman , Michael Rubinstein Increasing Confidence in Adversarial Robustness Evaluations Roland S.
And the way you said it just then, it sounded more like the first one: heres a new nice metric of how good your mechanistic explanation is. 00:26:47): And so what this gives us is an interaction metric where we can measure how bad this hypothesis is. But I dont know, it feels kind of surprising for that to be the explanation.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content