This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A lawsuit filed by TikTok and ByteDance in the court of appeals for the District of Columbia calls the law an "unprecedented violation" of the First Amendment. The companies add that the requirement to divest TikTok to avoid a nationwide ban is not commercially, legally, or technically possible, partly because.
And, with a few exceptions, the government hasn’t stopped expecting nonprofits to adhere to its rules, either. Right now, 41 states and the District of Columbia require licenses for games of chance like these. Some jurisdictions even ban them outright.
If successful, the FTC’s case — which was joined by 46 states, the District of Columbia, and Guam — could force the company to divest itself of Instagram and WhatsApp, radically reshaping the digital economy. In addition to being revisionist history, this is simply not how the antitrust laws are supposed to work.
Epic’s complaint builds on information gleaned from government antitrust probes and documents produced since the original suit. Google’s relationship with Samsung came under the microscope earlier this month when 36 states and the District of Columbia sued Google for breaking antitrust law.
District Court for the District of Columbia put it in his recent decision , “No one who hears the title of the 2010 film ‘The Social Network’ wonders which company it is about.” Value in social networks is calculated, depending on whom you ask, algorithmically (Metcalfe’s law) or logarithmically (Zipf’s law).
Fortunately, companies and governments alike have made it possible to dispose of your old devices responsibly. National chains There is no national electronics recycling law at this time, so you won't find any federal programs to assist you with getting rid of old devices. Heres how to find places that will take your old gadgets.
On Wednesday, the US Justice Department asked a federal judge to block California’s pivotal net neutrality law, according to Reuters. The Department of Justice filed suit against California soon after the law was passed , but the case was put on hold as legal challenges to the initial FCC order were adjudicated.
By attacking Twitter, the organization claimed that Trump’s order could discourage other platforms from exercising their free speech rights to moderate the president’s posts out of fear of retaliation from the federal government.
At the root of this concern is that no matter what ByteDance says about TikTok’s independence from Chinese governance, ultimately it must do whatever the country’s brutal, repressive authoritarian regime demands. Governing. ? government.” That makes it hard for high-risk users to feel entirely safe, no matter what the app does.
Though only a few weeks old, already the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is radically changing the face of bureaucracy in D.C. The Elon Musk-led agency has slashed government spending, gained full access to the Treasury Departments payments systems , and pushed federal employees to resign.
The order has already initiated a rolling back of protections for LGBTQ people and the weaponization of federal law against trans communities , according to both the Human Rights Campaign and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Other legal groups have launched similar trackers. SEE ALSO: Down with the Enola Gay?
President Donald Trump vowed to fight government abuse and introduce more transparency, a stance that might align him with a little-known agency charged with watching over the U.S.s District Court for the District of Columbia. The law is up for reauthorization next year. powerful spying programs.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content