This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Epic has renewed its fight against mobile platforms’ app store restrictions, filing an update to its antitrust case against Google. The filing adds mostly redacted details about Google’s alleged monopolistic behavior on Android, including banning Epic’s game Fortnite from the Google Play Store last year.
An antitrust lawsuit filed against Amazon by District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine was thrown out in court on Friday, according to a report by The New York Times. Earlier this week, Seattle District Judge Richard A. Illustration by Alex Castro / The Verge.
The attorneys general of three states and the District of Columbia are suing Google for the allegedly deceptive collection of location data on Android. Racine’s suit, filed today, accuses Google of violating DC’s Consumer Protection Procedures Act. Illustration by Alex Castro.
District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine is adding Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to a lawsuit over the Cambridge Analytica data-mining scandal. The 2018 lawsuit accuses Facebook (and now Zuckerberg) of misrepresenting its policies around third-party data access and compromising user privacy with lax protections.
Compliance is fairly straightforward on the federal level, but according to Labyrinth’s overview on state filing requirements , processes at the state level vary and can change quickly. There are major penalties for non-compliant nonprofits, ranging from late filing fees to revocation of your nonprofit status.
Blackbaud has now settled with all 50 states and the District of Columbia regarding the May 2020 data breach which has cost the firm millions in legal costs and fines. The others states and the District of Columbia settled in October 2023. Blackbaud settled with the State of California for $6.75
Roland Cloutier, global chief security officer for TikTok, says in a new court filing , in advance of an upcoming hearing in the US District Court for the District of Columbia, that the Commerce Department made several incorrect assertions about the company’s data security policies and practices.
"Plaintiffs bring this action to vindicate their right to serve the remainder of their respective terms, to defend the integrity of the Commission, and to continue their work for the American people," said the lawsuit filed by Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya in US District Court for the District of Columbia.
The lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia Tuesday and is one of the first legal actions taken against Trump’s executive order. On May 29th, Twitter restricted a tweet from Trump for violating its policies against glorifying violence.
Trending down : Pinterest is “hiding” rather than removing content that violates its policies, but much of it remains discoverable — and is being actively promoted via algorithmic recommendations. In an amicus brief filed Monday, the U.S. Their policies and rules are best understood as attempts at automation. Governing. ?
The ACLU filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. State Department on behalf of seven plaintiffs for a new policy that bans the "X" gender marker on U.S. Other legal groups have launched similar trackers. identification and forces individuals to carry passports listed with their assigned sex at birth rather than their gender identity.
The Presidents actions strike at the heart of the separation of powers, Travis LeBlanc and Ed Felten, the former members, said in their suit , which was filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. He said the board’s remaining member and its staff could still issue their own reports.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content