This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I’m co-facilitating a session on Nonprofit Training Design and Delivery with colleagues John Kenyon, Andrea Berry, and Cindy Leonard at the NTEN Nonprofit Technology Conference on Friday March 14th at 10:30 am! Using the ADDIE for designing your workshop, you arrive at the “E” or evaluation.
I’ll be sharing my best tips and secrets for designing and delivering training for nonprofit professionals that get results. And, if you are attending NTEN’s Nonprofit Technology in March, join me, John Kenyon, Andrea Barry, and Cindy Leonard for a session on designing effective technology training.
This call spurred the increasing demand for program evaluation. In your organization, this may look like negative attitudes toward evaluation, poor research designs and collecting data but not using the data. The root problem here is poor evaluation capacity. The root problem here is poor evaluation capacity.
Brilliance by Design by Vicki Halsey. A lot of work I do around social media is training — good training requires good design – not just content. The model balances content, learningdesign, and participants. The ideas, tips, and tricks are grounded in adult learningtheory, but the book is very practical.
But to do this effectively, businesses need to leverage the power of Learning Management Systems (LMS) that have the capacity to manage content and instructional design – and help in carving out personalized learning paths for the learners. Learn how to leverage virtual reality to engage millennia’s.
But to do this effectively, businesses need to leverage the power of Learning Management Systems (LMS) that have the capacity to manage content and instructional design – and help in carving out personalized learning paths for the learners. Learn how to leverage virtual reality to engage millennia’s.
But to do this effectively, businesses need to leverage the power of Learning Management Systems (LMS) that have the capacity to manage content and instructional design – and help in carving out personalized learning paths for the learners. Learn how to leverage virtual reality to engage millennia’s.
Kochenderfer Contact : philhc@stanford.edu Links: Paper Keywords : deep learning or neural networks, sparsity and feature selection, variational inference, (application) natural language and text processing Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Loss Authors : Jeff Z.
We think this adversarial style of evaluation and iteration is necessary to ensure an AI system has a low probability of catastrophic failure. Wed like to support more such evaluations, especially on scalable oversight protocols like AI debate. and Which rules are LLM agents happy to break, and which are they more committed to? .
The purpose of my thesis was two-fold: To research and analyze community and civic engagement practices, methods, theories and examples in other museum programs. To apply the results of my analysis to produce a community-driven program design specifically for implementation at the Santa Cruz Museum of Art & History (the MAH).
Some relevant criteria for evaluating a specification language include: How expressive is the language? For example, suppose that we want to design a chess-playing AI. We can do this using only supervised learning and imitation learning (by training on chess games between strong human players).
Derrick Xin , Behrooz Ghorbani , Ankush Garg , Orhan Firat , Justin Gilmer Associating Objects and Their Effects in Video Through Coordination Games Erika Lu , Forrester Cole , Weidi Xie, Tali Dekel , William Freeman , Andrew Zisserman , Michael Rubinstein Increasing Confidence in Adversarial Robustness Evaluations Roland S.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content