This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The email, which was sent to the Brain Women and Allies listserv, voiced frustration that managers were trying to get Gebru to retract a research paper. The technical co-lead of Google’s Ethical Artificial Intelligence Team claims managers were upset about an email she’d sent to colleagues.
Gebru wrote an email to the Brain Women and Allies listserv describing her frustration over the paper, and mentioned her doubts about Google’s commitments to diversity and inclusion. She says Google told her the email was “inconsistent with the expectations of a Google manager.”
Gebru sent an email to the Brain Women and Allies listserv at Google detailing the pushback she’d gotten on the paper. “You’re not going to have papers that make the company happy all the time and don’t point out problems,” she said. That’s antithetical to what it means to be that kind of researcher.”.
In December, Gebru said she was abruptly fired over an email she sent to the Brain Women and Allies listserv. “We cannot say we believe in diversity, and then ignore the conspicuous absence of many voices from within our walls.”. The departures point to an ongoing conflict between Google management and staff.
Gebru says she was terminated over an email she sent to the Google Brain Women and Allies listserv, an internal group for Google AI research employees. The search giant’s publication process has been in the spotlight since the firing of AI ethicist Timnit Gebru in early December.
Last week, Gebru tweeted that the company had abruptly fired her over an email she sent to the Brain and Women Allies listserv. So I see this as "I'm sorry for how it played out but I'm not sorry for what we did to her yet." 4 — Timnit Gebru (@timnitGebru) December 9, 2020.
When I left my position at Easter Seals , I had seven-plus years of research covering the field of nonprofits online flowing (more like gushing) in daily via email newsletters, listserve digests, etc. After three months, it’s been a cleansing experience (for my Inbox and my brain).
Out of habit, I started off doing the research in my usual ways - posts to listservs, search engine, private emails, and posts to forums. I would fill in the missing pieces and refine with chacha, serach engines, private email, or listserv queries. I got about half dozen or so pretty useful leads.
I'll explain why in a minute) Someone posted the url to a listserv. I hate it when I can't instantly pull facts out of my brain. I slapped a list of blogs in my wiki for me. Another person responded It's just another list (that is obsolete as soon as its posted). There's not even a description of what the blogs do.
I shared this on a listserv with some nonprofit technology geeks (aka circuit riders) and one of them told me that his father worked at the same school as Doug in Minnesota. m reading and two or three pieces of content flow up from my network that begin to click together in my brain like magnets, making connections.
My social marketing colleague Craig Lefebvre, who has a blog ( On Social Marketing and Social Change ), asked me to expand some comments I had made on the Social Marketing Listserve as a guest blogger. After that, I found myself reading things and thinking ???This This would make a great blog post!???
It’s how my brain works. So feel free to get on our mailing listserv or whatever the real phrase is called and stay in touch. And I want to talk about an experience I had working with an advocacy organization. And the way that I’m going to talk about these case studies is the purpose, the structure, and the outcome of each.
And just my brain just explodes five minutes into any talk of hers. But our buddy, Jen Shang, who is probably the world’s foremost philanthropic psychologist, she is awesome. She has written the coolest research studies and papers that we’ve had the opportunity to sponsor over the last few years. So check that out.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content