This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
There are two different methods to evaluate your training. Alternately, you may feel so good about it and say my job is done. Use LearningTheory. This includes documenting your session, reviewing your decks and exercises, analyzing your instructional design, and figuring out how to improve it.
Concretely, this research agenda involves answering questions such as: What is the right method for expressing goals and instructions to AI systems? The next question is whether or not a given reward learningmethod is guaranteed to converge to a reward function that is sufficiently accurate in this sense.
Designing and delivering a training to a nonprofit audience is not about extreme content delivery or putting together a PowerPoint and answering questions. If you want to get results, you need to think about instructional design and learningtheory. And, there is no shortage of learningtheories and research.
The title of this post is a play on a book I read The Book of Learning and Forgetting by Frank Smith in 1998 when I was working with arts educators on integrating technology into their lesson plans. I would recommend technology resources and they would share books about learning. and tag it. Many times I forget.
Were interested in more research on this, and other stress tests of todays state-of-the-art alignment methods. Alternatives to adversarial training : Adversarial training (and the rest of todays best alignment techniques) have failed to create LLM agents that reliably avoid misaligned goals.
We also managed to leverage these results to produce a new method for conservative optimisation, that tells you how much (and in what way) you can optimise a proxy reward, based on the quality of that proxy (as measured by a STARC metric ), in order to be guaranteed that the true reward doesnt decrease (and thereby prevent the Goodhart drop).
The purpose of my thesis was two-fold: To research and analyze community and civic engagement practices, methods, theories and examples in other museum programs. This can be accomplished through a variety of feedback methods conducted both inside and outside the museum.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content